A Cure for the Common Conscience
CS writes,
Don’t look now but Professor Anthony Bogaert said, ” These results support a prenatal origin to sexual orientation development in men.” He made these statements in an article called, “Womb Environment ‘makes gay men’” He went on to say, “A woman’s body may see a male fetus as “foreign”, he says, prompting an immune reaction which may grow progressively stronger with each male child.”
Something smells fishy, if this is a scientific study why not use scientific language instead of the politically correct word, “gay”, which is a redefinition of what, once, was a decent word. So lets read between the lines, scientists can’t find a homosexual gene so they are looking elsewhere to prove that homosexuals are a ‘third sex’.
I’m missing something, I thought evolution was supposed to ensure the survival of the species? Wouldn’t a homosexual gene, or womb issue, damage this? Well according to Bruce Bagemihl “[his studies]demonstrate the evolutionary advantage for a variety of non-reproductive, same-sex sexual relationships.” So animals have “relationships” that are binding and contingent on same-sex requirements? This sounds awfully human. Are we animals or are we more? Make up your mind scientist guy. Is it a “relationship” between two consenting adult dogs? Can dogs consent? Hmmm….
The article provides further insight by quoting Andy Forrest, smoke blower(spokesman) with Stonewall - a homosexual rights group, said: “Increasingly, credible evidence appears to indicate that being gay is genetically determined rather than being a so-called lifestyle choice. It adds further weight to the argument that lesbian and gay people should be treated equally in society and not discriminated against for something that’s just as inherent as skin colour.”
Ahh… the truth. The real agenda is now clear. Sorry bud I ain’t buyin’ a thang yer sayin’. Is there a need to even address this guys twisted truth? Maybe so. “Increasingly, credible evidence appears…” umm.. where? No homo gene, so far this womb homo creation thing is a fantasy, so where is the evidence? In your jeans maybe? Skin color and homosexuality is NOT the same. You can find evidence of a colour gene but nothing for homosexuality. Why try to prove a homo gene exists? Give it up and be “gay” with your lifestyle choice. This may be off color but having sex with someone is still a choice, right?
Psa 51:5 Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me.
There is the problem, was the Psalmist a homo? No. We can say without a doubt that sin is sin. God placed a conscience inside of us. The Psalmist went on to say,
Psa 139:14 I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made: marvelous are thy works; and that my soul knoweth right well.
Fearfully - Hebrew ירא (pronounced yaw-ray) morally revere.
Wonderfully - Hebrew פּלה (pronounced paw-law) distinguished, set apart.
We were made different from all other species and were created to morally revere our creator. “Gen 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. ” We were created by God and for His glory.
Science is trying to run a con game on our society, driven by political and evil forces. The god of this world would love nothing less than to destroy what God created, spiritually and physically. We are more than animals, don’t let them fool you. They are trying to bamboozle our society into an unhealthy lifestyle. God didn’t place warning labels on certain individuals but he did warn all humanity that the wages of sin is death. This Con-Science will NOT cure your Conscience. Only the blood of Jesus Christ and submission to His gospel will do that.